「大英帝国の醜聞 第三幕」 (Daiei Teikoku no Shuubun Daisanmaku)
“A Scandal in the British Empire Act 3”

I think I sometimes fall into the trap of considering Yuukoku no Moriarty an attempt at a faithful updating of Doyle. It really isn’t, and thus it’s not fair for me to hold it to that standard. This is nothing new – the series has been doing non-canonical things (and incorporating earlier non-canonical elements) since the beginning. It’s perfectly free to do that and it’s hardly the first, but the fact is that it can be a struggle for me to remember that.

In most respects I thought the denouement of “A Scandal in Bohemia” redux came together pretty well. You just have to accept certain pretexts to get there: Irene genuinely got herself in over her head, and Sherlock became emotionally tangled in her situation. The truth is that his best chance to keep her alive is exactly what he did, putting her into the hands of someone operating outside normal society to protect her. She’s a threat to the British government as long as she’s alive, and that puts her at risk either at home or abroad.

Taken at her word (and I see no reason not to at this stage) Irene’s ideals actually do seem to overlap pretty well with the James Moriarty. So it’s no stretch for her to go to work for them, and only logical for them to fake her death in order to facilitate that. The meeting at the church was pretty believable, with the fake cops and the envelope (which Holmes later burns once he realizes it’s no longer needed) a fairly logical means of ensuring mutual cooperation. I do wish Sherlock would have figured out the Lord of Crime’s identity by now because I think the dynamic between them is stronger if he has, but I suppose that would take the plot places it’s not ready to go to yet.

I’m less happy with the meeting between Mycroft and the James (and Adler), though it had its interesting moments. Robespierre being a British agent is a twist, I grant you. And the idea that he staged the Reign of Terror in order to unite everyone against him is novel, though a bit of a stretch – but it’s necessary in order for Yuukoku no Moriarty to reframe the brothers’ actions through a self-sacrificial lens. As for Robespierre actually being Sherrinford Holmes, that was certainly out of left field. Sherrinford is an interesting oddity in Holmes folklore – the only connection to Doyle is that Sherrinford was one of his rejected names for the titular character, but Sherrinford nevertheless shows up in numerous non-canonical Holmes reboots starting in the 50’s (even Doctor Who) as the eldest Holmes brother.

What doesn’t fully grok with me here is Mycroft walking away on the terms he does. I know he has a secret to protect that’s more personally dangerous to him than even the government (oh wait – he is the government, I forgot) but I don’t feel like he’s getting enough here for what he’s giving up. And then there’s the ending – if name-dropping Sherrinford was left field, Adler deciding she was “James Bonde” was right off of Waveland Avenue. That’s too cute for its own good if you ask me – you don’t need to try and be clever and tie in something that has nothing to do with anything, just to say you did. Ah, well – I’m still enjoying this trip quite a lot. and I suppose that’s all that matters.

3 Comments

  1. This is the first time I wasn’t very happy with this series. With James Bonde, the Moriarty-Mycroft agreement, the Holmes ancestor. It all just came off as odd to me, and I’m not even a big Sherlock Holmes fan, having only watched the movies and BBC series.

    But I’ll just set this aside and watch the rest without getting too caught up in how I feel about these developments. This is still a solid series

    Mononyan
    1. Someone on another site (well, mine) referred to this as a Holmes fanfic, and I think that may not be a bad way to look at it. And I don’t mean that as a pejorative – I’ve written fanfic, some of it is very good. It’s like the mangaka wanted to do all the cool (as he saw it) Holmes stuff Doyle never did. It definitely reaches the silly level for me at times (like that ending) but it’s a good reminder that this isn’t canon and isn’t claiming to be.

  2. Mycroft walked away because he’s aboard what they are trying to do. The whole “french revolution plot” was something they wanted to try to install in England used France as an experiment and failed, so he’s basically using the Moriarty brothers to try to do their balance in there, as long as they don’t get out hand. He’s keeping a close watch because they are the most useful to weed out the bad seeds and pave a way to reform the system. He’s also willing to sacrifice them or indulge their martyrhood and self-destruction.

    I think by this point it should be obvious the Sherlock-Moriarty dynamic (in particular William) isn’t about enmity (it’s perceived this way by Watson who in the novel writes under Conan Doyle penname), Liam and Sherlock aren’t being passive-aggressive when they met and interact, they really like each other and like to challenge each other but in good sport and good feeling. You know William wants to kill himself as a scapegoat shouldering everything, and chose Sherlock as someone to denounce him to play “hero”. Do you think Sherlock (the same Sherlock who went to lengths for Adler when he figured out the kind of person she was and what she did things for?) wants William to die or suffer? Just keep this in mind when the series advance and ask yourself if Sherlock, once he figures out, would gladly sacrifice Liam. It’s not the typical rivalry like Light or L, or Suzaku or Lelouch.

    Anais

Leave a Reply to Mononyan Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *